The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the申在者的申在默认情况下，因缺乏检控。The applicant was absent, and the court concluded the applicant was not interested in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl96l2024
ASHLESH KUMAR GUPTA Vs L & T FINANCE HOLDINGS LTD GUPTA
18.09.2025
Item no.34
Present None for applicant Mr. Navin Kumar, Counsel for respondent FI
Matter is taken through video conferen cingl Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant. None appeared today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present sA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
sl (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashlesh Kumar Gupta
L & T Finance Holdings Ltd
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
