The Special Leave Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant had made no representation since April 2022 and did not appear on the next date despite being called out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 24.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.85 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. Order-sheet of the learned Registrar |
|||
| rst - 46 | dated 14.03.2025 shows that no representation was made by the Applicant since 19.04.2022 and not taking steps to proceed with the matter. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.85 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
