Single line order dismissing the applicant's Special Appeal in default for non-appearance. No arguments were heard as the applicant did not attend the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
s[l84l2024
HUMA NAZ VS TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD
23.07.202s
Item no. 35
Present
None for applicant.
Ms. Sonia Rawat, counse! for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencinglhybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent FI has appearedtoday before this Tribunal and submitted that the account ofthe applicant has been settled.
Despite repeated calls, no one appearedon behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants arenot interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent SA isdismissedin default for non- prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
sJ: (susHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Huma Naz
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
SusHil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
