Dismissed
Mandakini Dilipkumar Gaikwad v. Nido Home Finance Limited
DRTSA/82/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
29.07.2025
Sr. No.40 SA No. 82/2025
SECURITISATION APPLICTION NO. 82/2025.
Mandakini Dilipkumar Gaikwad and ..Applicants
Three Ors.
V/s.
Nido Home Finance Limited and Anr. ..Respondents
None for the applicants.
Mr Munde Suresh W. – Advocate for defendants.
1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the
proceeding for applicants.
2. Today, none appeared for the applicants. It appears that the
applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. In view of the above, I pass the following order.
ORDER
A. The Securitisation Application No. 82/2025 stands
dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of
accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classifi cation No. of Exh.
[Ambadas] (SA No.82/2025) Page 1 of 1
Mandakini Dilipkumar Gaikwad
Nido Home Finance Limited
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court