Disposed
Anirudh Singh v. Icici Bank Limited
DRTSA/806/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Disposes of a withdrawn constitutional petition by the Applicant on agreed terms with the Respondent-Bank, including a repayment schedule.
What did the court decide?
Order the withdrawal of the 5A petition on the terms and conditions of the settlement.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO.
¶3
CASE NO.
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA806/72 | ||
07/07/75 |
Applicant byShriSachinJain,Advocate throughV.C. and MrsSurabhiJain,Advocate Respondent by Shri Sanjeev Dubey, Advocate |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantinvitingattentiononlA 4770/25dated 02/07/25praysforpermission to withdrawthis5Asubjecttoconditionmentioned undertheappticationforwithdrawat. He furtherapprisethatas per oraltermsand conditionsofthesetttementbetweenthepartiesthe Respondent-Bankhasagreedtoctosetheloan accountsubjecttodepositingRs.28 takhout ofwhich Appticanthasatready deposited Rs.5 Lakh.He furthersubmitsAppticantis readytodepositfurther9 Lakhby30107/25andthebatance amountofRs.14 Lakhshatt bedepositedby30/08/25. Counselfor theRespondent"Bankhasconsentedwith thesubmissionof theCounselfor theApplicant. Lookingtoconsentandagreementofboththesides this5A stands disposedofaswithdrawnontheterms andconditionsof the setttementasmentionedabove. Record be consignedtoRecord room. (RamN asPatet) Presidingofficer Onmatterbeingtakenperusalofrecord revealsthat asper directionoftheTribunalthisllAhasalready beenrestoredtoits originalnumber. |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Ram N as Patet
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sh.ram Niwas Patel
- Order 2 — this page · Sh.ram Niwas Patel
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court