Sudhir v. Iifl Home Finance Limited
DRTSA/794/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The order is unintelligible due to severe textual corruption and OCR artifacts, preventing extraction of substantive legal propositions, parties, or facts.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
'EBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| a proceeding |
r | leeaction takenwith d&te |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.794/2023 10.09.2025 SL.No.62 |
None appears for the appIIc I find that vide order date& this SA has been disposed infructuous. However, the datb madein theordersheet. In view of the order datedl the SAisdisposed off asinfructd Letthefilebeconsigne room. Orderbeuploadedon th website. (Dib (Pravask Presidib Mugish) |
ant. 13.05 off has 13.05. ous. btor kTrib tated<br>uFrTa g Offi |
.2024 being been 2024, ecord unal’s N_.ngh) cer |
Coram
AI extract
Pravask
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court