An applicant failed to prosecute a securitisation application. The tribunal dismissed the application in default due to non-prosecution and vacated any interim stays.
The Securitisation Application No. 78/2025 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 16.09. Sr. No |
2025 .27 SA No. 78/2025 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICTION NO. 78/2025. Shri Rukmini Sahakari Bank Ltd. ..Applicant Versus Shree Warana Sahakari Bank Ltd., and Ors. ..Respondents None for the applicant, and respondents. 1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the proceeding for applicant. Earlier also nobody has appeared. 2. Today, also none appeared for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No. 78/2025 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[Ambadas] (SA No. 78/2025) Page 1 of 1
Shri Rukmini Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Shree Warana Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
