The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a service application (SA/769/2022) filed by Mukesh Kumar Mali against Art Housing Finance India Limited. The application was dismissed in default as the appellant failed to appear despite notice.
The service application filed by the appellant was dismissed in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 25
Case No.SA/769/2022
SHRI MUKESH KUMAR MALI Vs ART HOUSING FINANCE INDIA LIMITED
Date: 23.07.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Ms. Kratika Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
None appeared on behalf of the applicant despite Passover.
Accordingly, SA stands dismissed in default. All pending IAs
stands disposed off if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SHRI MUKESH KUMAR MALI
ART HOUSING FINANCE INDIA LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
