Allowed
Sri Bacchu Ghosh v. Idfc Bank Limited
DRTSA/747/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Debts RecoveryTribunal-3,Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶2
| caseNo.SAI'74 | 7/2.122 SriBacchu Ghoshvs.IDFCBankLim |
ited |
|---|---|---|
| DateofOrder | Orderwithsignature | Signatureot |
| OrderNo.08 Dt.27.O3.2025 Sl.No.22 |
Present: ForApplicantiNone ForDefendant:Ld. CounselMs.RitikaPandey Ld, Counsel Mr,Amar Singh |
|
| sh | IAl1286/2025is taken upforhearing, HeardLd,counselforrespondentFI Considered. Noneappearsfor theSARFAESIapplicant. |
|
| Ld CounselfortheApplicantfiledI.A.No.1286of2025 prayingforwithdrawalofthemain S.A. Theapplicationis supportedby Affidavitoftheapplicant Sk.Shaheb. Duringthe pendencyoftheS.A.thematter hasbeensettledwiththe RespondentBankandtheRespondentBankisnotgoingto continuewith theinstantproceedinqandhas issueda'NoDues Certificate'.Sincethisis anamicablesettlementbetweenthe partiesandtheApplicant intendstowithdrawthemain S.A.,no prejudicewillbecausediftheI.A.isallowedwithoutinviting responsefromotherside.Accordingly,theinstantI.A.is allowed and standsdisposedofbeing dismissedaswithdrawnas settled amicably, S.A. No.747of2022alongwith all otherpendingI.A.s, if any,isdasposedofaswithdrawn. FilebeconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities. (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Sri Bacchu Ghosh
- respondent
IDFC Bank Limited
Coram
AI extract
KamalDe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court