Single judge dismissed the Section 17 application as premature and not maintainable. The court held the cause of action relied upon was insufficient before symbolic possession was taken, denying the amendment application.
Application dismissed as premature; liberty granted to file a separate application to challenge the earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| s4733t24 21/05t25 |
ApplicantbyShriArjunBajpai,AdvocateandShri AmitDavi, Advocate Respondent-Fl by ShriNitinAgrawat, Advocate On matterbeingtakenCounselfortheAppticant apprisethatafterfiting eartier appticationlA3496/25 dated08/05125subseguentappticationfor amendmentlA3629/25dated 13/05/75 hasbeen fited.Hefurthersubmitshedesirestonotpress eartierlAwithlibertytopresssubsequentapptication tA3629t25. Asprayed lA3496/25 beingdismissedasnotpressed withtibertytopresssubsequentappticationfor amendment. CounselfortheAppticantpraysfortakingdocument theCertificateCopyof theorder onrecord.Prayer attowed.Documenttaken on recordaccordingty. Counselfor'theApplicant praysforattowinglA 3629/25tochattengetheorderdated23/12/24 passedbyADMUjjainuls14ofSARFAESIActandatso togrant stayagainsttheexecutionprocessbeing scheduledtodaybyattowing 1A3628/25. Onbeing queried onwhatcauseofactionAppticant hasfitedthis5ACounsetfortheAppticant inviting attentionondocumentAnn.A-9daLed30/05124 submitstheRespondent-Flhasissuedpossession noticeasperprovisionof13(4)ofSARFAESIActon whichbasisthisSAbeenfiled. CounselfortheRespondent opposesthesubmission submitsthe letterdated 30/05/24isanintimation letterto theborrowerto takestepasper provisionof sec.'13(4)onorafter08/07124sinceAppticants fai[ed todepositthedemanded amount. CounselfortheRespondent ptacing copyofpossession noticeissuedasperRute8(1)of5l(E)Rutesapprise thattheRespondent-Flhastakensymboticpossession on06/08/24issuingthepossessionnoticeandatso pubtishedinnewspaper. PerusaloftheNoticeptacedbytheRespondentside andletterdated 30/05/24Ann. A-9itreveatsinfact before06/08/24noactionasper rute 8(1)(2)ofSl(E) 12 -,-' |
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| rutes2002fortakingpossessionofthemortgaged propertywasinitiatedbytheRespondent-Fl however, Appticantssidehasfited thisSAcounting cause of auctionfrom intimationletterdated30i05/24which is not actionu/s13(4)oftheSARFAESIActandatso nevergives causeofactionto fitethisSA.ltisalso foundtheApplicantshaveatsoyetnotchattengedthe PossessionNoticedated 06/08/24 inthisSA. PerusalofretiefclauseoftheSAitreveatsthe demandnotice dated19/12/ZZandtheletterdated 30/05/24arechattengedand nootherindependent retiefisctaimedwhich givecauseofactiontofite application/s 17(1)ofSARFAESIActtoaggrieved person. ForthereasoninmyopinionthisSAis prematureand notmaintainabletoheron merits. AtthispointoftimeCounsetfortheAppticant submits sincetochallengethe orderdated23/12/24 applicationforamendmenthasatreadybeenfitedand onthisgroundpraysfortakingappticationfor amendmentandtheSAforhearing onmerits. lnmyopinionsince SAisnotmaintainabte, app[icationforamendment maynotbe consideredin thisSA.Howeverwith libertytotheApplicantstofite separateSAtochattengetheorderdated23/12124 passedbyADMUjjain,this5Aisbeingdismissedas premature. CourtMasterisdirectedtoreturnthe originaldocuments,ifany,taggedwiththeSAtothe Appticants. (Ram iwas Patet) Presidingofficer |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Section 17 application is maintainable given that the cause of action is premature?
Whether the intimation letter dated 30/05/24 constitutes a valid cause of action under the SARFAESI Act?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Applicant
Respondent-I
Ramjas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
