The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant's case as infructious based on the respondent's submission that the account was closed and the matter was settled, without the applicant's presence.
The applicant's appeal (SA) was disposed of as infructious and the matter was settled between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 31
Case No. SA/703/2023
MUKESH KUMAR MAALI Vs MENTOR HOME LOANS INDIA LIMITED
Date: 13.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Alok Mathur, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the Respondent submits that SA has become infractuous as the account has been closed and matter has been settled between the parties.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent that the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed off as infractuous.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MUKESH KUMAR MAALI
MENTOR HOME LOANS INDIA LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
