Disposed
Smt Mahendri Yadav v. Bank of India
DRTSA/693/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Order dispensed not to impose cost on applicant and proceedings declared infructuous.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| Dateoforderor lroceedin! |
Order withsignatureofcourt |
IOfficeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| SA No.693/2025 17.12.2025 SI No.60 |
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava,Ld Counsel for the applicant is present. Mr. RanaRahulSingh, Ld.Counsel fortherespondent-bankispresent. Ld. Counsel for the respondent- bank has filed IA DyNo.1270/2025for informing this Tribunal that respondent- bank has withdrawn its SARFAESI proceedinginrespect to the notice under Section13(4)and all the stepstaken further has beenwithdrawnbynotice \aDb dated 04.8.2025 and applicant has,duly informed regarding same. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits thatexpenditureof this SAmay not be imposed upon theapplicantby the respondent-bank. Respondent-bank is directed notto |
|
| impose cost of this SA upon the applicant. SAbeinginfructuousisdisposedof. Let thefilebeconsignedtorecord room. Order beuploadedontheTribunal’s website. (Dictated) /H' <br>(PravasKumarSingh) PresidingOfficer (Veeresh) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court