The Debts Recovery Tribunal Jaipur allowed a withdrawal application as the dispute between the applicant and the respondent bank had been settled.
Allowance of withdrawal of Stay Application as matter settled; SA disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 41
Case No. SA/680/2022
MR SIDDHARTH GUPTA Vs IDFC BANK LIMITED
Date: 02.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri R K Salecha, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Saransh Ghiya, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MR SIDDHARTH GUPTA
IDFC BANK LIMITED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
