The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur dismissed the special application as not pressed after the applicant's counsel stated there were no further instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 15
Case No.SA/667/2023
SUGNA RAM SO GHEESA RAM Vs BAJAJ HOUSING FINANCE LTD
Date: 21.08.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Vishwas Shukla, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the applicant pleads no instructions from the applicant.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the applicant, this SA stands disposed of as not pressed.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Sugna Ram so Ghessa Ram
Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
