Shree Tiles v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal was hearing an application. The tribunal dismissed the proceeding as a default application because the applicant was absent and failed to appear before the tribunal.
What did the court decide?
Application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/64/2025 SHREE TILES Vs BANK OF BARODA
20.08.2025 Item No.32
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SHREE TILES
- respondent
BANK OF BARODA
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court