This party (SH Dinesh Kumar vs IIFL Home Finance Limited) applicant claimed that the secured account was settled/closed. The Presiding Officer of the DRAT disposed of the Securitization Application as infractuous. No substantive reasoning was provided.
Securitization Application disposed off as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 31
Case No. SA/632/2023
SH DINESH KUMAR Vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED Date: 17.01.2025. Present:
Shri Kailash Tailor, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Himanshu Saini, Proxy Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI Ld. counsel for the applicant submitted that account stands settled and closed, therefore, this Securitization Application becomes infractuous.
In view of the above submissions, this Securitization Application stands disposed off as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SH DINESH KUMAR
IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
