Applicant sought to withdraw a petition before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, citing account regularization. The tribunal allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; SA disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 25
Case No. SA/62/2024
MS SWASTIK MINERALS Vs BANK OF BARODA
Date: 01.04.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Piyush Khandelwal, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the account has been regularized.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MS Swastik Minerals
Bank of Baroda
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
