Manik Saha v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an application for withdrawal of a special appeal filed by Manik Saha against an order of the DRT, Kolkata, after the matter was settled amicably with Canara Bank.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed as withdrawn; Respondent directed to return title deed within 15 days.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No. SA/607l 2O24 Manik Saha
canara Bank
Oate of Order order with signature
Order No.l1 PrCsent : l
ot.22.05.2025
Sl. No.19 For Applicant : Ld. Counsel K. Das
For Defendant : None
1A12249125 is taken up for hearing,
Heard Ld. counsel for SA Applicant.
Considered.
None appears for the Defendant Bank.
ss Ld. Counsel for the SA Applicant filed I.A. No. 2249 of 2025
praying for wathdrawal of the main S.A The application is
supported by Affidavit of the applicant Sri l'4anik Saha. During
the pendency of the S.A. the matter has been settled with the
Respondent Bank and the Respondent Bank is not going to
continue with the instant proceeding. Since this is an amicable
settlement between the parties and the Applicant intends to
withdraw the main S.A., no prejudice will be caused if the I.A as
allowed without inviting response from other side. Accordingly,
the instant l.A. is allowed and stands disposed of as wrthdrawn
and settled amicably.
Respondent Bank is directed to return Title Deed of the
mortgaged property to the SA Applicant, if it is not already
done, within 15 days from the date of this order, as Per rules.
S.A. No. 607 of 2024 along with all other pending I-A.s, if any,
as disposed of as withdrawn,
File be consigned to Record Room after observing all formalities
( Kamal De )
Presiding Officer
DRT 3, Kolkata
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manik Saha
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court