The applicant failed to appear in person or through counsel for the third time. The court held the applicant was not interested and dismissed the application in default.
Application dismissed in default for non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/60/2024
MS KEWAL KRISHAN ASHOK KUMAR Vs AXIS BANK
22.01.2025 Item No.30
Present: None for the Applicant.
Sh.Rahul Garg, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
MS KEWAL KRISHAN ASHOK KUMAR
AXIS BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
