The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal as the matter had been settled between the applicant and the respondent bank. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Special appeal allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 80
Case No. SA/565/2023
VIKAS KUMAR Vs KOGTA FINANCIAL INDIA FINANCIAL
Date: 06.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Ritin Jain, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
VIKAS KUMAR
KOGTA FINANCIAL INDIA FINANCIAL
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
