This is a default dismissal order where the applicant's counsel submitted no instructions. The Single Appellate Bench set aside a previous auction and therefore dismissed the Special Appeal in default.
Set aside of the impugned auction order is dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 63
Case No. SA/561/2023
MS GRAND BATTERIES PVT LTD Vs BANK OF BARODA
Date: 22.01.2025.
Present:
Shri Nikhil Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, auction which was challenged was set aside
and Counsel for the applicant submits he pleads no instruction from the applicant.
Considering the submission made by Counsels, this SA stands disposed of as dismissed in default.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MS GRAND BATTERIES PVT LTD
BANK OF BARODA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
