The applicant sought withdrawal of the Special Appeal as the matter was settled. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of Special Appeal allowed; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 32
Case No. SA/556/2023
CHETAN PRAKASH SINGHAL Vs SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 10.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
CHETAN PRAKASH SINGHAL
SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
