The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application filed by the applicant in default due to the non-appearance of the applicant and lack of representation at the hearing.
Application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/481/2024 GHULAM MOHAMMAD DAR Vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
19.05.2025
Item No.7
Present: None for the Applicant.
Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 12:55 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application filed by the applicant should be allowed in their absence given the repeated failure to appear.
GHULAM MOHAMMAD DAR
JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
