This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
s[l47l2O24 CHANDER SHEKHARVS AU SMALL FINANCE BANK tIMITED
28.M.202s
Item no.48
Present: Mr. S. Ojha, Counsel for applicant
Mr. Sandeep Soni, Prory C.ounsel for Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Counsel for respondent bank
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/ Hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the fresh cause of action has arise and he has filed fresh SA against the fresh cause of action, therefore, this SA has become infructuous and he is withdrawing the present SA.
The Prory Counsel for respondent bank has not opposed the same. As the applicant has already filed fresh SA against the fresh cause of action, therefore, this SA no.4712024 is dismissed as infructuous.
File be consigned to reord room.
ely (SUSHIL KUMAR RA5TOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Chander Shekhar
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
SUSIL KUMAR RAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court