The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of an双休 as infructuous on the ground that the underlying account had been closed.
The application (SA) and all pending Interlocutory Applications (IAs), if any, were disposed off as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 58
Case No.SA/448/2024
SARFARAJ KHAN Vs EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Date: 29.08.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Rohan Agarwal, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been closed and SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed off as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SARFARAJ KHAN
EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
