Disposed
Abdul Hai v. Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
DRTSA/447/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 24
Case No.SA/447/2024
ABDUL HAI Vs ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD
Date: 18.08.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kirti Kapoor, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Bhupendra Singh Shekhawat, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that they are withdrawing the notice under Section 13(2) which is deemed withdrawn. Counsel for the applicant submits that he is not in contact with his client.
In view of the above, Accordingly, SA stands disposed of as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Abdul Hai
Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court