Disposed
Ankush Gadwal v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
DRTSA/441/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO
¶3
CASE NO
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA44u22 29l0u2s |
ShriHemantDubey,Advforthe Applicant ShriMallikarjun Khare,Advforthe Respondent |
|
| OnmatterbeingtakenResPondent CounselinvitingattentiononIA No.248l25applicationfordismissalofSA apprisedthataccountofApplicantshas alreadybeensettledamicablY. OngiveninformationApplicantCounsel orallypraysfor withdrawalofthisSA. Lookingtoconsensusitrevealsthatloan disputehasalreadybeenresolvedthereis no needtoprosecutethisSAfuither. Thereforeoralprayerforwithdrawalis allowed. |
||
| SAis disposedofaswithdrawn. | ||
| Recordbeconsignedtotherecord room. (Ram s Patel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court