The Presiding Officer allowed the withdrawal of Special Appeal No. 43/2024 by Shabina Qureshi, as the matter had been settled between the parties, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Special Appeal allowed as withdrawn; matter settled; file consigned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 90
Case No. SA/43/2024
SMT SHABINA QURESHI Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
Date: 11.02.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Karan Pratap Singh, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
File be consigned to record as per rules
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Shabina Qureshi
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
