Default application SA/406/2023 by Sakina Mustafa Patel against HDFC Bank in Jaipur DRT disposed as dismissed due to non-appearance of applicant despite summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 14
Case No.SA/406/2023
MRS SAKINA MUSTAFA PATEL Vs HDFC BANK
Date: 21.08.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Abhishek Bhandari, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
None appeared on behalf of the applicant despite Passover.
In view of the above, SA stands disposed of as dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MRS SAKINA MUSTAFA PATEL
HDFC BANK
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
