Smt Hemlata Saini v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order disposing an infructuous Securitization Application because the respondent bank withdrew all actions under the Securitization.
What did the court decide?
Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 44
Case No.SA/403/2025
SMT HEMLATA SAINI Vs CANARA BANK
Date: 08.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Ramnaresh Vijay, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the respondent bank submits that the bank has withdrawn all the action taken under the Securitization.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hemlata Saini
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court