In second hearing, the applicant failed to appear. The Presiding Officer held that the applicant showed no interest in the matter and dismissed the application in default.
Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/38/2025
MS KANISH HOSPITAL Vs CANARA BANK (SYNDICATE BANK)
15.05.2025 Item No.5
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
This is second pass over since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application should be dismissed due to default by the applicant.
MS KANISH HOSPITAL
CANARA BANK (SYNDICATE BANK)
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
