Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's claim to set aside the bank's eviction notice and declare ownership, holding the applicant was not a borrower and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to declare property title.
The Securitization Application was dismissed with consequential closure of pending interlocutory applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THEDEBTSRECOVERY TRIBUNAL - II ATHYDERABAD DATEDTHIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST'2025
PRESENT:sH. RAMESHWARTI,:-S'E.raC;;''L LB (Hons )' M A'
SecuritizationApplicationNo 373 OF 2023
Mohd ShakeelAhmed S/oMuneerAhmed ^7" fl '.["31i:ir.uiii,'i'?l'"'n "'"'th Naea r liiu"irl"i,nvo"t.bad,telansana-s000t 3
.. .....APPlicant.
Versus
Andhra PradeshI'4aheshCo-operative Urban Bank Limited Reo bv itsAuthorizedOfficer ll'","(,".e-):danlig2,noao No 12' Banjara HiIIs Hyderabad-5000345, Telangana
... Respondent
Counselfor the A\Pticant : Mr' ArunnMarriPeddi Counselfor Reslondent: Mr' Mettu SrinivasReddY
.:ORDER:-
2.The case of the appllcant'in brief is that he is a third party' runningbusinessintheapplicationschedulepropertypremisessince purchase.The respondent initiated action againstthe subject properry inviolationof fundamental rights under Article 14' 21 and 300-A ofthe Constitutionof India and hence all such action is liable rc be selaside. fu.tti>e
page 2 of 5
SA No.37312023
ii) ro what retier? //fuu'* \ -..
Page 3of 5
sA No.37312023
Point No.(il:
B.The applicant earlier filed IA No'2655/2023in this SA seeking stay ofproceedingspursuantto eviction notice dated 16.08.2023. The saidIA was dismissed on merits' It is pertinentto reiteratethe it readsas to reiectthe IA and observationsof this Tribunal OYn** hereunder:
page 4 of5
SA No.37312023
"3. I have cgnylered the submissions and perused the material record. The borrowei i)i..,."-uona. Gufran executed MqDT on 17.j0..201.4 i, nrpuri'li iiru, tz shops tyins on different ftoors in,tn" suiiiZi-i;;;;"r. rhe petitioner has not uttered a singte word is i;;o;';;'urquired the property. However, as per covenants of iarc"-aeeO dated 16.10.2012 pressed into servi^ce,,y1 i, y, ,iioiri-or Shop No.ll in the schedute premises. which fe, t;.;;;,share of borrower of respondent bank by..virtue of puiiiioi Deed Doc.No.10B of 2010 and whereas, the .saiei""J i'iiit"d to be executed bv Md. Gufran (oor12yv9^r2 tnroiji'ii."eope vide resistered AGqA Doct No.26eq/2oto d;;;; ;;:.bi.roto. However, copy or the AGpA is not made "iiiELG r*-i o f t h e s a t e d; ; :, rh " vehemen,y said that the t e; pet;tto;;;'iiu"r' ; ; ;;" ;; ;;; ;, ,"ru, ;: : i!:;!: been I present in"ii, t:;r subject property,^:yen ,at .the tir,"- ir delivering eviction l"i;; [l'""3;;51:r":arso.nas ni'i i*,,q9a "ivp1"ir'17'ii, t;;;;";' r;;;;:itt::''lyrthe?as rishttv. p"i't"a-'oi' iii oo,,oeiiia-;,,:!.;?:i::0""i,!"pl!;,,r,i.,"f ;[{A";i:, argument sake, is lot made i ny * the present proceedings. The,petition is liiOte ti"ie Aismissed on this count alone. Under. 2uch circuiiar-ce"s, I do not find anv te n a b t e s ro u n d to .i n te ra i ci i; ;;;';;2, "i in'i"r", oi, iJ i liable to bank under be dismissed.sec.14 ",r.yii nii) io6i.1i,rsty, petition is
has ll" utterly 11y,": failed_o, the to above observations, substantiate his plea r conctude to set aside that steps the appticantto take physical possession of application schedule property. Accordingly SA is liable to be dismissed.
Point No.(ii):
Page 5 of5
SA No.373/2023
12, consequently,Interlocutory Applicationspending, if any,shall stand closed"
(Typed to my dictotionby the P5,corrected'signedondpronounced by mein the opencourt on this the 28th doYof August, 2025)'
-4 /t/ lll\rr^-, _r{, , / ' flnrs'' (RAd(EsHwARKorHE) PRESIDINGOFFICER
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant established any valid ground to set aside the eviction notice and claim title over the property.
Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to declare title over a property.
Whether the secured creditor has the right to take physical possession of the secured asset.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd Shakeel Ahmed
Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Co-operative Urban Bank Limited
Rameshwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
