Dharam Narayan Sharma v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant requested to withdraw the Securitization Application. The Presiding Officer allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the Securitization Application was allowed and the application was disposed of.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no.32
Case No. SA/368/2023
DHARAM NARAYAN SHARMA Vs UCO BANK
Date: 07.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Atul Saxena, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Vijendra Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the applicant submits that in instructions he does not want to pursue this Securitization Application and wish to withdraw the same.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dharam Narayan Sharma
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court