Bachcha Singh v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Kolkata, dismissed the Sale Affidavit filed by the Applicant for default due to his non-appearance at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Order Sheet (continuation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No.SA/ |
36/2022 BACHCHA SINGH Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK |
Offi ti ith |
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | ce acon w date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 15/09/202 | None appears for Sarfaesi Applicant. | |
| 5 | Ld. Counsels Mr. Md. Amjad Ali and Ms. M. Begum appear for Respondent Bank. Ld. Counsel for Respondent Bank submits that vide order dated 14/07/2023, sale became infructuous and prays for dismissal of SA as the Applicant is not present for hearing to press the SA. Ld. Counsel for Respondent Bank submits that the Bank has taken possession of the asset. Due to non-appearance of Applicant, SA is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, is vacated. |
|
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
(Sne)
BACHCHA SINGH
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court