In this securitization case, the applicant challenged NPA status. The respondent bank submitted that the account was regularized. The Presiding Officer disposed of the application as infructuous, finding no basis to proceed given the regularization.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 7
Case No. SA/356/2024
MR ISHTIYAL KHATRI Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED Date: 23.04.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Mohit Choudhary, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Ramnaresh Vijay, Counsel for the Defendants
In this matter, counsel for the respondent bank submits that the account is regularized.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MR ISHTIYAL KHATRI
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
