In default proceedings, the applicant did not appear despite a notice. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/3s0 12024 SHARAD GUPTA AND ANR Vs CANARA BANK
26.L2.2025
Item no.25
Present: None for applicant Ms. Seema Gupta, Counsel for respondent no.1 Mr. Abhay Kumar Tayal, Counsel for respondent no.2 Ms. Ishani Banerjee, Counsel for respondent no.4 & 5
None for other respondents
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid mode.
None on behalf of the applicants. Despite issuance of default notice none appeared today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution;
File be consigned to records.
s\z (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
SHARAD GUPTA AND ANR
CANARA BANK
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
