The judgment is a brief default order. The applicant failed to appear for the third hearing despite multiple notices. Due to the absence of the applicant, the application was dismissed in default. No substantive legal propositions were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/35/2022
MS MAHADEV TRADERS Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
16.07.2025 Item No.4
Present: None for the Applicant.
Mr. Jatinder Sharma, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
This is third pass over since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
MS MAHADEV TRADERS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
