Dismissed
Vijay Jaisingh Sonmale v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
DRTSA/347/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 21.03.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.347 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| nrb – 32 | None for the parties. Case called out but there is no response from either of the parties. Order-sheet of the learned Registrar dated 16.10.2024 shows that sufficient time was given to the Applicant to take further steps in the matter and the Counsel for the Applicant present sought to withdraw his appearance due to lack of instructions from the Applicant. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.347 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court