Under SARFAESI Act, applicant submits readiness to repay dues in time-bound manner as per Scheme of Arrangement (SA). Respondent accepts terms and notes SA as infructuous. Presiding Officer dismisses SAC. Relief: disposal as infructuous.
The Specialist Appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl344l2o2s
MR. ANIL KATHURHAND MRS. POOJA KATHURIA VS. M/S ENCORE ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION CO. PvT. LTD.
29.12.2025
Item no. 11
Present Shri Sankalp Srivastava, counsel for applicant.
Shri R.P.Aggarwal, counsel forrespondent FI.
Matter is taken through VC/Hybridmode.
respondent FIwill be free to take actionunder the provisions of the SARFAESIAct.
With the aboveobservation,the present SA is
disposed ofas infructuous.
File be consignedto records.
S9 (susHIL KUfrl'AR RASToGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
M
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Anil Kathurhand Ms. Pooja Kathuria
M/s Encore Assets Reconstruction Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
