The Special Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant took no steps since 10.04.2024, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Special Appeal No.333 of 2023 stood dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 23.01.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.333 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Indrajeet Hingane (through VC), Advocate for the Respondent. |
|||
| rst- 36 | Order-sheet dated 08.08.2024 by the learned Registrar shows that the applicant was not present and Mr Kushal Sawant, represented Respondent No.1. and the Applicant took no steps since 10.04.2024 to proceed with the matter and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. It appears from the conduct of the Applicant that he is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.333 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal No.333 of 2023 should be disposed of for want of prosecution.
Whether the matter is liable to be dismissed given the applicant's inactivity since 10.04.2024.
Applicant
Respondent No.1
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
