The Single Judge disposed of the SARFAESI application challenging the respondent bank's measures in non-prosecution. An affidavit confirmed the loan account is closed with a zero balance, meaning no debt exists against the applicant.
SARFAESI application disposed of for non-prosecution due to zero balance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet
| Case No. SA | 333 of 2022 MR SUSHIL PAUL AND ANR -VS- UCO BANK |
|
|---|---|---|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 28.8.2025 (Sl. No. 16) |
Ms. Kasturi Dasgupta, (Virtually) Ms. Johan Ara Kulsum. … For the Respondent Bank. |
|
| None appears for the sarfaesi applicant. | ||
| Learned counsel for the respondent bank has filed affidavit with document that the loan account of Sushil Paul, the applicant, has been closed and has filed statement of account which shows that closing balance is ‘Zero’. As there is no debt against the applicant, the sarfaesi application challenging measures of the respondent bank is disposed of for non-prosecution. |
||
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer ac |
Mr Sushil Paul and Anr
UCO Bank
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
