Mrs Beena Gupta v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi, dismissed the Section 34 application on default due to non-prosecution by the applicant despite issuing a default notice.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/33012022 MRS BEENA GUPTA Vs BANK OF BARODA
13.06.2025
Item no. 30
Present: None.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. counsel for both the parties are not appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf cf the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
s,A (SUSHIL KUlvrHx RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Beena Gupta
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court