Smt Om Pati v. Axis Bank Ltd. and Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:tr .! I s,'; ;l :l , : :ili it, :., ..
Debts nffielv : l:,''.l' .;'. Tribunat-Il, Delhi 1. li.',J:'r '.: ,
iiIlll' "' sMr oMpArr $f1ffi3'::i,irlrD AND oRs
29.0t.2025
Item no.38
Present: None for applicant Mr. Randhir singh, counser for respondent bank
Matter is taken through viaeo conferen cinglHybrid Mode.
None appeared on th.g{gptgate of hearing on beharf of the applicants. Despite iegs$teiof default notice none appeared today. It appears tnJtltn. appricants are not interested in pursuing the case. nencei the present sA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution. .r r,..-. ,. - ,, -,; ''
File be consigned to recjrds.' : i. i t::; : T
I :,r;.. (susHIL KUIviHx RASTOGI) i. , -"F;.i, i PRESIDING OFFICER i..:. if;.-l '' .- ifEtir:r'i J.. - ! DRT-II, Delhi '5ff,Fc",: :r' *..'1,-1 -':i .1. - ',;. -.+ i '.r"!-.... .
+,,
ri
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicants
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court