Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi dismissed Special Appeal in default proceedings as no one appeared for the non-prosecuting applicants after default notice issuance, despite representation by the respondent's proxy counsel.
Special Appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution as applicants failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sv3r7l2024 SUBHASH PRASAD Vs CHOI.AMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE LIMITED
27.08.2025
Item no. 20
Present: None for applicants. Shri Himanshu, proxy counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
,A. (SUSHIL KU IfAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
Subhash Prasad
Choi.Amandalam Investment and Finance Limited
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
