Dismissed
Ms Mukesh Kumar Jeewanram v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/317/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA317t24 16/05/25 |
NonefortheAppticant Respondent-Bank byShriArunK. Pandey,Advocate |
|
| Matteristakenup ontherequestofRespondent side. CounselfortheRespondentinvitingorder28104/25 praysfordismissalofSA. |
||
| Pe4sua[oflast orderitappearsthatnoneappeared onbehatfoftheApplicants.Todayatsonone appearedon behatfof theApplicants.ltappearsthat theAppticantshavelostinteresttoprosecutethe matterfurther.Therefore,the5Astandsdismissed forwantofprosecution.Recordbeconsignedtothe RecordRoom. (Ram wa et) Presidingofficer |
GONTD.
Respondent Bank
Ram wa et
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court