The Single Bench of the DRT-I, Chandigarh, dismissed the Special Appeal as the counsel for the applicant stated there were no instructions to support the application.
No relief granted. Special Appeal dismissed due to lack of instructions from the applicant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/317/2023 SH RAMESH SEN Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
22.07.2025 Item No.39
Present: Mr. Satish Jaswal, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Arpit Chawla, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Satish Jaswal, states that he pleads no instructions on behalf of the applicant. In view of this, SA stands dismissed. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
SH RAMESH SEN
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
