Kuldeep Singh v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In a default appearance, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application under SA/309/2024 due to the absence of the applicant despite multiple adjournments, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed in default due to non-appearance of the applicant.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/309/2024 KULDEEP SINGH Vs HDFC BANK
21.01.2025 Item No.33
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh. Lakhbir Singh, proxy Counsel for Sh. Suneet Kumar, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- appellant
KULDEEP SINGH
- respondent
HDFC BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court