Single line order by Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur discharging an application declared infructuous after respondent counsel informed that the client's account was regularized.
Securitization Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 33
Case No.SA/307/2025
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Date: 05.12.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Akarsh Mathur, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Dhruv Rathore, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, counsel for the applicant submits that he has not received any instruction from this client. Ld. counsel for the respondent bank submits that he telephonically informed that account is regularized.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Applications stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Central Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
