Ameya Inc. v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application in default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite notice. The matter will be consigned to records.
What the court decided
Debts Recovety Tribunal-If, Delhi
sA/301 12022 AMEYA INc Vs CANARA BANK
28.04.2025
Item no.42
Present: None for applicant Ms. Shabana, proxy Counsel for Ms. Sunit Sharma, Counsel for respondent Oan[ Matter is taken through Video Conferen cing/Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on the tast date of hearing on behalf of the applicant. Despite issuance ;i-;J;rrir",i." none appeared today' It appears that tne applicants ii.-not interested in i"H:I$::r".4;idrence,the present sA is dismissed in deraurt
File be consigned to records.
-s-T" (susHrL KUMAR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER' DRT-II, Delhi
c
Parties & counsel
- applicant
AMEYA INC
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court