The application in the Debt Recovery Tribunal was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite specific notice. The court characterized the action as a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il,Delhi
sA/30/2O2s
MS TEJINDER KAURVS HINDUJAHOUSINGFINANCE LTD AND ANR
20.tt.2025
Item no.40
Present: None for applicant Mr. Gaurav Srivastava,Counselfor respondentFI
Matter is taken throughVideo Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
None appeared onbehalf of the applicant. Despite issuance of default noticenone appeared today. It appears that the applicants arenot interestedin pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in defaultfor non-prosecution.
File be consignedto records.
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
Tejinder Kaur
Hinduja Housing Finance Ltd
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
